Category Archives: VS Extensibility

MZ-Tools Articles Series: BUG: Visual Studio 2008 crashes if unloaded when an add-in executes DoEvents statement on startup

Although this article applies only to the old Visual Studio 2008, I am writing it for completeness of the body of knowledge that I have built over the years about add-ins. And if you are a VSX developer who cares about your users/customers, chances are that your extension still supports Visual Studio 2005 / 2008 (which are widely used yet at companies because for some reason developers don’t always migrate to the latest version. See How many old Visual Studio versions does my add-in/package have to support?). Recently I encountered an issue in one of my scripts that remove add-in commands, and it took me a while to find that the root cause was a bug in Visual Studio 2008:

BUG: Visual Studio 2008 crashes if unloaded when an add-in executes DoEvents statement on startup

If you were in the VSX world in the VS 2008 era of add-ins, you may remember that there was another bug that caused VS 2008 to crash on startup:

BUG: Add-in causes Visual Studio 2008 crash when loaded

Fortunately both bugs were fixed in next releases.

New Project System Extensibility sections

One of the areas of Visual Studio Extensibility (VSX) that I am not very familiar with is project system extensibility, that is, creating new project types, extending project types with flavors (project subtypes) or creating custom tools (single file generators). I knew that that extensibility area was hard, though, as every piece of Visual Studio extensibility that was created around Visual Studio 2005 / 2008.

Yesterday, the time has come for a huge improvement in that area, when Microsoft made public a new Common Project System (CPS) Extensibility SDK in preview for Visual Studio 2015 that aims to simplify project type creation getting rid of MPFproj (“often containing well over 100K lines of code”).

I have noticed that this extensibility area was not well covered in this VSX site, that aims to provide pointers to every VSX bit of information out there, so I have created these new sections:

BUG: Extension Manager of VS 2015 RC doesn’t show large image for installed extensions

While a couple of days ago I was testing the last .vsix installer of my MZ-Tools extension, now converted to a package, with Visual Studio 2015 Release Candidate, I discovered that its large image was not shown in the Extension Manager. At first I thought that it was my fault, because the VS SDK doesn’t warn you that a resource included in the extension.vsixmanifest (such as the license agreement) isn’t actually included in the package project. After fixing another bugs that were my fault, today I investigated this one, and it happens with all installed extensions, not only with mine. So, while browsing the Visual Studio Gallery (“Online” node of the tree), the large image is shown as expected. Here you have the Developer Assistant, for example:

VisualStudioGallery

But once you install it (“Installed” node of the tree), its large image is not shown, the ugly default one is used:

Installed

I have opened a bug on Microsoft Connect:

Extension Manager doesn’t show large image for installed extensions
https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/1391193/extension-manager-doesnt-show-large-image-for-installed-extensions

Hopefully it will be fixed for VS 2015 RTM. You can vote for it to make it so.

Visual Studio 2015 RC quality good enough for extensions

I have been very stressed the last weeks in my spare time (nights and weekends) to ensure that the upcoming version 8.0 of my MZ-Tools extension works with Visual Studio 2015 CTPs and RC. This has been complicated because of these factors:

  • MZ-Tools 7.0 was an add-in, and MZ-Tools 8.0 will be a package.
  • MZ-Tools 8.0 for VS shares 80% of code with the also upcoming MZ-Tools 8.0 for VBA / VB, which is not yet finished.
  • VS 2015 belongs to my definition of “painful” category for extensions, because of the Roslyn-based implementation of the file code model.

Today, VS 2015 RC has passed for the first time the 3,300+ automated tests of MZ-Tools. And they are integration tests (not unit tests), each one testing a whole user-simulated scenario: clicking the options window of MZ-Tools, setting some options, clicking the button of a feature, capturing the result (either contents of an output toolwindow or generated code) and comparing with the expected result. They are able to detect subtle changes in the behavior of VS 2015 such as different automatic formatting, automatic removal of line continuation character “_” in VB.NET, automatic addition of parenthesis “()” to parameter-less VB.NET methods if the test omitted them, namespaces omitted from types in the Error List after a build, etc.  These are not really bugs but required to tweak the tests, in some cases maintaining backward compatibility with previous VS versions and in some cases detecting the VS version and using different code.

The tests also detected problems in the automation file code model (EnvDTE.ProjectItem.FileCodeModel), which I patiently isolated to root causes resulting in a total of 18 bugs that I have reported on GitHub, the last one, quite obscure, yesterday.  At the time of this writing, at least 15 are fixed (or will be fixed for VS 2015 RTM) and the remaining three ones have workarounds that I have coded to pass the tests.

So, at this point, VS 2015 RC is good enough from my point of view.

MZ-Tools Articles Series: HOWTO: Use the Browse for Folder dialog of Visual Studio from a package

Another question in the MSDN VSX Forum about the browser for folder dialog was intriguing enough for me to investigate. If you are using the .NET Framework since version 1.0 (like me), you may remember that that version didn’t provide a class, you had to use the native class of the Win32 API Shell, which was tricky. The FolderBrowserDialog was added in .NET Framework 1.1, and since then it has this appearance:

NetFolderBrowserDialog

Despite being in Spanish (the computer that I am using to write this post), you can guess that it provides a title, a description, a treeview and an optional button to allow the creation of a new folder without leaving the dialog.

However, Visual Studio uses this other dialog to select a folder in several places:

VisualStudioFolderBrowserDialog

Again, despite being in Spanish, you can guess that it provides a treeview to the left and a listview to the right, along with the button to create a new folder and, overall, somewhat better usability.

So, the question was how to leverage that Visual Studio dialog from a package. The answer lies in the IVsUIShell.GetDirectoryViaBrowseDlg method, and in this new article of mine you have a working example, because the API is awful, with arrays of structures, memory allocation, marshaling, etc:

HOWTO: Use the Browse for Folder dialog of Visual Studio from a package

MZ-Tools Articles Series: HOWTO Unload/Reload a project from a Visual Studio package

I have created two new articles/samples from a question that I addressed in the StackOverflow forum, about unloading / reloading a project programmatically. Using the automation model (EnvDTE) I knew the answers since many years ago:

DTE.ExecuteCommand(“Project.UnloadProject”)
DTE.ExecuteCommand(“Project.ReloadProject”)

However, that approach requires that the project is selected previously in the Solution Explorer. Furthermore, having migrated my MZ-Tools add-in to a Visual Studio package I am no longer happy when I have to use the old automation model and I am eager to investigate how to do things using native services. Alas, the investigation is never easy. In this case the IVsSolution interface provides the CloseSolutionElement method, which is not intuitive because it serves to unload many things, from the solution to a document, and certainly a project too. And it doesn’t seem to provide a method to reload a project. So, I opened the MSDN documentation for IVsSolution2, IVsSolution3, IVsSolution4, IVsSolution5 and IVsSolution6 interfaces and lo and behold, the IVsSolution4 interface has the answers in the UnloadProject / ReloadProject methods. If you remember, Visual Studio 2012 introduced asynchronous solution loading (something that seemed to start in Visual Studio 2010), so the new IVsSolution4 interface introduced quite a few methods that helps with that area. So, here are the samples:

HOWTO: Unload a project from a Visual Studio Package

HOWTO: Reload a project from a Visual Studio Package

Both methods require the project guid that identifies the project in the solution (not to confuse with the project type guid). You can get the project guid from a IVsHierarchy that represents a project calling the GetProperty method with the __VSHPROPID.VSHPROPID_ProjectIDGuid property. For VS 2010, alas, when the project is unloaded the “hierarchy stub” that represents the unloaded project in the solution doesn’t implement that property (it does in VS 2012 and higher). So, the second article applies to VS 2012 and higher (because it starts with an unloaded project as the initial condition), while the first could apply also to VS 2010.

Finally, for completeness sake, given a IVsHierarchy that represents an unloaded project you can get the unload reason calling the GetProperty method with the __VSHPROPID5.VSHPROPID_ProjectUnloadStatus property, which should return a value of the _VSProjectUnloadStatus enumeration.

Three bugs in MSDN Walkthrough: Extending the Solution Explorer Filter

One of the things that I do from time to time is to take a question in the MSDN Visual Studio Integrate or StackOverflow forums about a subject of VSX that I am not very familiar with, and try to investigate and provide an answer. The other day I picked this one about extending the Solution Explorer filter with a custom filter, something that I didn’t know.

The question was that following the MSDN Walkthrough: Extending the Solution Explorer Filter the sample didn’t work for VS 2013 Update 4. I reproduced the issue and after some investigation I concluded that it was a bug in VS 2013, because the version of the Walkthrough for VS 2012 actually worked. I reported it to Microsoft Connect (the report seems to have been deleted now) and actually what was wrong was the MSDN sample, which should use the SVsServiceProvider parameter type (instead of IServiceProvider type) in this constructor:

public FileNameFilterProvider(SVsServiceProvider serviceProvider, ...)

There is now a MSDN feature suggestion to fix the code sample. But the sample has other two bugs:

  • The Utilities.cs class is no longer required, you can use the provided HierarchyUtilities class.
  • The command should not be bound with an event handler in the Initialize() method of the package. Its command guid/id are used as parameters in the SolutionTreeFilterProvider attribute to bind the command with the filter.

MZ-Tools Articles Series: HOWTO: Create a toolwindow WITHOUT a ToolWindowPane class in a Visual Studio package

The usual way to create toolwindows in a package is described in my last post HOWTO: Create a toolwindow with a ToolWindowPane class in a Visual Studio package. While with add-ins only a usercontrol was required, with packages you need the usercontrol and a class that inherits from ToolWindowPane. That is, two files. When I first learned this, I found it somewhat overkill. But when I started to migrate my MZ-Tools add-in to a package, which has quite a few toolwindows, I found it totally overkill. Furthermore, requiring to decorate the package with a ProvideToolWindow attribute for each toolwindow defeats the 3rd strategy that I exposed in Strategies migrating from Visual Studio add-ins to packages, in which a core plug-in provides the features (and therefore the usercontrols for toolwindows) and a host adapter provides the communication between the host (Visual Studio) and the core plug-in. The host adapter is not aware of the features implemented by the core plug-in, and therefore it shouldn’t use specific toolwindows classes or attributes. I am aware that the ProvideToolWindow attribute and the class that inherits ToolWindowPane serve a purpose which was not available for toolwindows created by add-ins: to show automatically when VS is launched the toolwindows that were open in the last VS sessions. So, the initialization of the toolwindow must be contained in a class and not in the “click event” of the command that shows the toolwindow. But it happens that add-ins can provide that functionality too with minimal effort: when unloaded the add-in stores which toolwindows were open and when it is loaded again it shows them. Version 7.0 of MZ-Tools, being an add-in, offered this feature since it was released in 2012.

So, I wanted to create toolwindows in my MZ-Tools package like I was doing in my MZ-Tools add-in. While you can use the automation model (EnvDTE) from a package, alas, the EnvDTE80.Windows2. CreateToolWindow2 method is among the few ones that cannot be used from a package because it requires an EnvDTE.AddIn parameter, that a package cannot provide. Fortunately, the the IVsUIShell interface provides a CreateToolWindow method that can be used from packages. In this new article (equivalent to HOWTO: Create a dockable toolwindow from a Visual Studio .NET add-in) I show how to use it:

HOWTO: Create a toolwindow without a ToolWindowPane class in a Visual Studio package
http://www.mztools.com/articles/2015/MZ2015005.aspx

MZ-Tools Articles Series: HOWTO: Create a toolwindow with a ToolWindowPane class in a Visual Studio package

Creating a package with a toolwindow using the package wizard is easy because the wizard provides you an option to do it:

PackageWizard

However, the steps to create a second toolwindow are not evident. And even if you figure out the steps, knowing what they do may be difficult. And if you come from the add-ins space (where toolwindow creation uses an easier approach), toolwindows of packages is difficult stuff. This question has appeared twice in the StackOverflow forum in the last days.

I have written the following article to explain the stuff generated by the wizard when you request the toolwindow option, how the pieces are connected, and why each piece is required:

HOWTO: Create a toolwindow with a ToolWindowPane class in a Visual Studio package
http://www.mztools.com/articles/2015/MZ2015004.aspx

In my next post/article I will explain a different approach to create toolwindows in a package, without a ToolWindowPane (hence the title of this article).

MZ-Tools Articles Series: BUG: Toolwindow guid attribute value hardcoded in code generated by Visual Studio package wizard

I am these days working on a couple of articles about toolwindows. As you know, the package wizard has an option to create a toolwindow for you that creates a lot of stuff with guids, ids, attributes and so on. One thing that you notice when you learn about packages with commands is that there are duplicated declared Guids for the package guid and command set guid in the .vsct file (<symbols> section, guidVSPackagePkg / guidVSPackageCmdSet guid symbols) and in the Guids.cs file (guidVSPackagePkgString / guidVSPackageCmdSetString constants). That duplication is unfortunate but required, because those two files are compiled by different tools (the .vsct file is compiled by the Vsct.exe tool of the VS SDK and the Guids.cs file is compiled by the C# compiler). However, when you create a package with a toolwindow, you get a third guid value duplicated, but that duplication is not required.

I have documented it in this article:

BUG: Toolwindow guid attribute value hardcoded in code generated by Visual Studio package wizard
http://www.mztools.com/articles/2015/MZ2015003.aspx

and I have opened a bug report at Microsoft Connect:

VS SDK package with toolwindow: constant guid not used in code, hard-coded guid instead
https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/1138161/vs-sdk-package-with-toolwindow-constant-guid-not-used-in-code-hard-coded-guid-instead

To prevent the problem in the future packages that you create with toolwindows, you can fix the templates by yourself as explained in my article HOWTO: Changing the source code of Visual Studio Package project templates.

And since I have verified that this problem exists in the templates of the package wizard since VS 2005, chances are that if your package uses toolwindows it has the duplicated guid value if you haven’t noticed it.